So the Dwarfs are going to return to Zaiyon(?), but I don't recall ever hearing anything else about this and it's the fourth(?) time I've played TEW.
Does anyone know anything?
It seems that it was borrowed from Tolkien's Dwarves, rather than being a Warhammer Fantasy's innovation on Dwarves:Capitaneus Fractus wrote: ↑Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:19 pmI don't know, but that is a reference to Zion ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zion ) from the time Dwarves in exile in Man's Empire, were seen as Warhammer Fantasy's jewish communities.
I think it was only ever a very loose analogy in Warhammer - there are a couple of parallels in descriptions of Expatriate Dwarfs and this intriguing reference to Zaiyon, but not much more than that. I'd be interested to know whether any of the original WFRP writers had this in mind. There were some discussions on the old 90s WFRP mailing list which I vaguely remember and some threads on Strike to Stun exploring the analogy.Capitaneus Fractus wrote: ↑Mon Nov 16, 2020 12:47 amIt seems that it was borrowed from Tolkien's Dwarves, rather than being a Warhammer Fantasy's innovation on Dwarves:Capitaneus Fractus wrote: ↑Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:19 pmI don't know, but that is a reference to Zion ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zion ) from the time Dwarves in exile in Man's Empire, were seen as Warhammer Fantasy's jewish communities.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwarf_(Mi ... sh_history
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khuzdul#External_history
i think it's something that was written with the (very brief) era of "dwarfs are chatoic beings whose only remaining settlement is dying out as much through infighting as it is from population issues" in mind. it barely works with that in mind, but the dawi as we know them in warhammer fantasy take more inspiration from norse myhology dwarves than anything. thankfully.dry_erase wrote: ↑Mon Nov 16, 2020 6:27 amI think it was only ever a very loose analogy in Warhammer - there are a couple of parallels in descriptions of Expatriate Dwarfs and this intriguing reference to Zaiyon, but not much more than that. I'd be interested to know whether any of the original WFRP writers had this in mind. There were some discussions on the old 90s WFRP mailing list which I vaguely remember and some threads on Strike to Stun exploring the analogy.Capitaneus Fractus wrote: ↑Mon Nov 16, 2020 12:47 amIt seems that it was borrowed from Tolkien's Dwarves, rather than being a Warhammer Fantasy's innovation on Dwarves:Capitaneus Fractus wrote: ↑Sun Nov 15, 2020 3:19 pmI don't know, but that is a reference to Zion ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zion ) from the time Dwarves in exile in Man's Empire, were seen as Warhammer Fantasy's jewish communities.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwarf_(Mi ... sh_history
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khuzdul#External_history
Whatever the intention, I think it's quite a dodgy analogy.
Yes, the script reads "Zaiyon". However, if we assume it reads "Saigon" (which is unlikely, though) we get another interesting pun. This one would refer to, depending on the perspective, either The Fall of Saigon or the Liberation of Saigon.
Yes - I think Warhammer works best when it draws on a range of archetypes and stereotypes and mixes them up into something vaguely familiar and slightly humourous. Warhammer Dwarfs are a bit Norse, a bit Yorkshire, a bit Scottish, a bit "down-to-earth tradesman coming to your house and criticising shoddy worksmanship" and probably a bunch of other things.
There's a TEW game write-up that uses that spelling here. I think that session is from after they'd finished TEW and were doing their own thing, though. I don't recognise it otherwise.
It's not about familiarity for me - it's about tact. Norse culture and British regional stereotypes are largely harmless when mixed together into the Warhammer Dwarf. We're drawing on small, exaggerated aspects of cultures (mostly historical or mythological) to make something that feels relatively plausible.Capitaneus Fractus wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 2:35 am On a side note, I am not sure to get why Norse and British range of archetypes and stereotypes would be familiar and humorous enough to works best among sources of influence for Warhammer Fantasy, while Ashkenazim range of archetypes and stereotypes might be unfamiliar and unhumorous enough to be best segregated out of sources of influence for Warhammer Fantasy...
I totally agree with you. The stereotypes and archetypes help make a fantastic world 'recognisable', but breaking or subverting them is what makes it interesting.Capitaneus Fractus wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 2:35 am (Regarding archetypes and stereotypes, I think I quite deeply disagree: my own opinion is that Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay, just like any role playing game, just like any fiction work, just like any work, works best when it happen to use the appearance of archetypes and stereotypes in order to broke them).
Yeah, maybe the analogy was more harmless in the 1980's when Warhammer Dwarfs weren't as cliché and cartoony. Also, after double-checking the WFRP 1e rulebook, Dwarfs were depicted as being more "displaced" than they are in current canon. Even Karaz-a-Karak was being overtaken by greenskins. So maybe when TEW was in production they had an idea for a Tolkienesque Erebor-type Dwarf realm that never ended up being developed.
There is also a history to the linking of mythological dwarfs and Jewish stereotypes beyond the question of Tolkein’s inspiration and intentions. The character of Alberich in Wagner’s Ring Cycle is generally agreed to be an anti-Semitic stereotype (as well as one of the more famous dwarfs in literature/culture). It certainly was something picked up on in Nazi Germany.dry_erase wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 4:18 amIt's not about familiarity for me - it's about tact. Norse culture and British regional stereotypes are largely harmless when mixed together into the Warhammer Dwarf. We're drawing on small, exaggerated aspects of cultures (mostly historical or mythological) to make something that feels relatively plausible.Capitaneus Fractus wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 2:35 am On a side note, I am not sure to get why Norse and British range of archetypes and stereotypes would be familiar and humorous enough to works best among sources of influence for Warhammer Fantasy, while Ashkenazim range of archetypes and stereotypes might be unfamiliar and unhumorous enough to be best segregated out of sources of influence for Warhammer Fantasy...
But if we present Warhammer dwarfs as Jewish communities (as you referenced), we're equating a real world ethnicity with non-humans known for many traits (physical and cultural) which antisemites ascribe to Jewish people. That's what makes it dodgy for me.
Whatever the reason behind including it was, the Zion/Zaiyon resemblance must have been intentional. The verse on the DotR handout is modified from Father Brennan's Biblical poem* in The Omen (1976):