Search found 268 matches
- Wed Dec 28, 2022 5:28 am
- Forum: 4th Edition
- Topic: 4th to 1st rules adaptation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8266
Re: 4th to 1st rules adaptation
I'm afraid the only practical conversion document will, in my opinion, read: "Drop 4th edition". That's it really. I spent a huge amount of time thinking, analyzing and play-testing 4th Edition, trying to fix issues and rewrite rules as needed. Nothing (and I mean nothing) this edition add...
- Wed Dec 28, 2022 5:14 am
- Forum: 2nd Edition
- Topic: Zapp's House Rules
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9571
- Wed Dec 28, 2022 5:12 am
- Forum: Sigmar’s Tavern
- Topic: Earl of Fife Games Announces Licensing Deal for Tetsubō - Former Warhammer Fantasy Setting Expansion
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1637
Re: Earl of Fife Games Announces Licensing Deal for Tetsubō - Former Warhammer Fantasy Setting Expansion
That brings me right back to the 80s. At first blush, it did me too. However, I am saddened to hear they went with a 1) new 2) generic 3) dice pool game. That's three strikes out of three. Instead writing the new iteration of the Tetsubō campaign world for an 1) existing, play-tested, rule-set that...
- Wed May 18, 2022 4:03 pm
- Forum: Den of Tzeentch
- Topic: Homage to Chuck
- Replies: 10
- Views: 11044
Re: Homage to Chuck
Congrats to still keeping the lights on, Chuck! Great to see the place remains active! 

- Wed May 18, 2022 3:50 pm
- Forum: 2nd Edition
- Topic: Zapp's House Rules
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9571
Re: Zapp's House Rules
Great to see that Chuck keeps this place alive, and I'm glad to see quite a lot of activity here (in all subforums) :) Just wanted to say I swung by today after a long absence (the v4 rules nearly destroyed my love for WFRP) and, to my great surprise, the yandex link to my houserules zip is still ac...
- Tue Jul 07, 2020 5:31 am
- Forum: 4th Edition
- Topic: 4th to 1st rules adaptation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8266
Re: 4th to 1st rules adaptation
Cap, I would love to read a post by you about the possible modifications to apply to 2nd edition. I already know the "number of attacks" House rule you wrote back in the StStun days and it works like a charm! I'm curious to hear if you have other nice ideas! This time I'll be a player, no...
- Wed May 27, 2020 11:22 am
- Forum: 4th Edition
- Topic: 4th to 1st rules adaptation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8266
Re: 4th to 1st rules adaptation
We've run a massive campaign in 4E. Will never use the ruleset again - next time we're back to 2E. So I've thought about which bots and bobs that can be salvaged. The players liked the open-ended careers system. But ultimately it just isn't balanced. There's a reason skills are secondary to characte...
- Wed May 27, 2020 11:08 am
- Forum: 4th Edition
- Topic: Ease of maxing WS
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6165
Re: Ease of maxing WS
Nope - this game is simply not well thought through.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 11:27 am
- Forum: 2nd Edition
- Topic: WFRP 2 career advances
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17704
Re: WFRP 2 career advances
Ah. I find it easier and faster to just make the calculation than use a table, but thanks.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 1:33 am
- Forum: 4th Edition
- Topic: Simplified resolution system
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8622
Re: Simplified resolution system
4th edition switches to opposed rolls. That alone fixes a lot of whiff. It does also introduce the potential problem of lopsided contests. Any character pouring experience into Fellowship, for instance, will quickly realize a score of maybe 75% Fel yields almost supernatural dominance of his hapless...
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 1:28 am
- Forum: 2nd Edition
- Topic: Roadwardens and pistols
- Replies: 24
- Views: 32522
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 1:25 am
- Forum: 2nd Edition
- Topic: WFRP 2 career advances
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17704
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 1:23 am
- Forum: 2nd Edition
- Topic: WFRP 2 career advances
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17704
Re: WFRP 2 career advances
Yes, the "plus" in characteristics advances can be easy to misinterpret. As Hyarion says, they're all absolute, never cumulative. The plus sign is just... convention, I guess. It's meant to tell you "no, that Bodyguard isn't limited to a measly 10% in Weapon Skill, lower than anybody'...
- Wed Mar 18, 2020 5:43 am
- Forum: Den of Tzeentch
- Topic: Cubicle 7 dropping the Lord of the Rings
- Replies: 25
- Views: 30422
Re: Cubicle 7 dropping the Lord of the Rings
I've already voiced this sentiment elsewhere, but I guess reposting it here can't hurt: I completely missed TOR when it first came out. I have no explanation for it not appearing on my radar, it just didn't. Once I did realize there was this acclaimed Middle-Earth game that really tried shaping adve...
- Wed Mar 18, 2020 5:35 am
- Forum: 4th Edition
- Topic: Removing advantage from the game?
- Replies: 20
- Views: 22910
Re: Removing advantage from the game?
I would like to thank you for adding that last paragraph. Your opinions are well voiced, but not necessarily shared by all. I just wanted to say I appreciate that understanding. I don't want fluffy discussion, but just the basics understanding that "ymmv". You're welcome. It's especially ...
- Wed Mar 18, 2020 5:23 am
- Forum: 4th Edition
- Topic: Removing advantage from the game?
- Replies: 20
- Views: 22910
- Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:27 am
- Forum: 4th Edition
- Topic: Removing advantage from the game?
- Replies: 20
- Views: 22910
Re: Removing advantage from the game?
The hard cold truth is that 4E is a trainwreck of a system, designed by people that utterly lost track of the bigger picture. It is 2E, except every conceivable subsystem have been made more complicated, broken and cluttery. After playing it extensively I have concluded that there exists no simple f...
- Mon Mar 16, 2020 7:23 am
- Forum: 4th Edition
- Topic: Removing advantage from the game?
- Replies: 20
- Views: 22910
Re: Removing advantage from the game?
Page 164 has a call-out box "Options: Limiting Advantage". They recommend a limit of either 2 or Init Bonus. Either would be more limited than the 'max 6' you decided to house rule, so if you're happy with your current system I would say don't change it just to comply with the call-out bo...
- Sun Mar 15, 2020 3:43 pm
- Forum: Den of Tzeentch
- Topic: Cubicle 7 dropping the Lord of the Rings
- Replies: 25
- Views: 30422
Re: Cubicle 7 dropping the Lord of the Rings
That press release announces a 'new edition', but whether this will be the, as i understand it, still quite new, second edition, or a third edition it doesn't say. Free League staffers have made clear (in various forums) the edition they intend to publish will be Francesco's 2nd edition (the work h...
- Sun Mar 15, 2020 3:40 pm
- Forum: 4th Edition
- Topic: Removing advantage from the game?
- Replies: 20
- Views: 22910