Rulebook says "You may use either hand to make an attack. Attacks made
using your secondary hand suffer a –20 penalty to any
applicable Test. "
Thats for attack. Rolling defense is not an attack roll, why do people say shield is -20 penalty?
Search found 3 matches
- Mon Dec 19, 2022 3:53 pm
- Forum: 4th Edition
- Topic: Rules - Shield use
- Replies: 19
- Views: 31373
- Mon Dec 19, 2022 3:49 pm
- Forum: 4th Edition
- Topic: Shield dont give -20%
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3899
Re: Shield dont give -20%
Its also logical. An untrained guy/girl could pick up a shield and sword, he/she would be better at defending then using a blade alone (many think its the same by rules, but even by rules shield is +10 better in defensive with no talents
- Mon Dec 19, 2022 3:44 pm
- Forum: 4th Edition
- Topic: Shield dont give -20%
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3899
Shield dont give -20%
Rulebook says "You may use either hand to make an attack. Attacks made
using your secondary hand suffer a –20 penalty to any
applicable Test. "
Thats for attack. Rolling defense is not an attack roll, why do people say shield is -20 penalty?
using your secondary hand suffer a –20 penalty to any
applicable Test. "
Thats for attack. Rolling defense is not an attack roll, why do people say shield is -20 penalty?